inductive proof造句

例句与造句

1. This can be shown by inductive proof.
2. The same technique can be used to give an inductive proof of the volume formula.
3. He gives the first non-inductive proof of the binomial expansion for integer exponent using combinatorial arguments.
4. This is a great help, as the system has an unproductive tendency to wander down infinite chains of inductive proofs.
5. This is especially true in inductive proofs, where the given expression is taken to be the inductive hypothesis, and the target expression the inductive conclusion.
6. It's difficult to find inductive proof in a sentence. 用inductive proof造句挺难的
7. A proof such as a deductive proof, an inductive proof, a proof by contradiction, and a proof by construction are the usual stuff that a mathematician follows and accepts readily.
8. This proof tree can be shown to contain at most 4 \ log _ 2 n-4 values other than 2 by a simple inductive proof ( based on Theorem 2 of Pratt ).
9. Of course in practice many inductive proofs / recursive constructions are trivial at the limit step, and start with a well-understood object at the base, so you write down only the successor step.
10. An inductive proof generally shows that some property is true for any " finite " integer " n "; such a proof can't show that it's true if " n " is infinite.
11. The all-at-once proof " does " have the merit of characterizing the points that are kept, but the inductive proof shows the structure of what has to be removed ( and in particular the structure of countable closed sets in general ).
12. I've looked at inductive proof but it seems a bit messy and I'm hoping there's a nice clean / concise solution-I have no doubt the reference desk brains are far more capable of coming up with an elegant proof than I am; ) ( or if there is a particularly concise inductive proof, I have nothing against induction ! ) Could anyone suggest anything, please?
13. I've looked at inductive proof but it seems a bit messy and I'm hoping there's a nice clean / concise solution-I have no doubt the reference desk brains are far more capable of coming up with an elegant proof than I am; ) ( or if there is a particularly concise inductive proof, I have nothing against induction ! ) Could anyone suggest anything, please?